Devon ke Dev Mahadev Written Update:9thAugust 2013 - Page 2

Thanks for the update reeti.

Vrish, may be the makers are actually making this show for those who haven't read or heard Mytho stories before. So they are getting carried away by some appreciartions on the social networking sites.

@meenu di
Pleasure is all mine meenu di 🤗

@Surya: Thanks alot 😊
Well I really have no idea to such an extent so that I can give any comment on yesterday's story , but then I also don't What DKDM is showing and what it is gonna be in next months. I really either want it to be too good. like something very special as it was or I want some thing which will totally not watchable so that I can stop thinking about DKDM 🤣 but noh. this only makes me as to go behind it.. i mean not too bad and not too good kind of situations..

As they shown in the last episode...like they were showing Ram & Laxman and another way Sita and Urmila.. and then Suddenly They jumped up to shubhak' story... 🤔

I want some consistency which it used to have in the intial days.. but from last 6 months i would say.. the show has somewhere like its lost.. and not finding a way what to do with.. so It came up with a track which is Mahadev ke Ram 😳 Then it will go to Humara Bharat Mahadev ka 🤓 (Mahabharat)

Apart from all this .. shubhak .. ?? Was it a valid way to show Mohmaya , If shubhak was a devotee of lord shiva and also he worships the linga.. then how he didn't know about his attire 😒
may be he didn't know how he looks but he must have know..what mahadev's attributes. that what kind of look he must had have 👎🏼

So many things to discuss but yet it is DKDM so its better to not discuss about and just keep accepting what it shows. 👍🏼

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Surya

Did Naarbhaga's brothers divvy up the entire property w/o putting aside anything for him, and did his father agree to that? That's what they showed, and thereby, they made it look like Mahadev endorsed such selfishness, which would be very out of character.

Moh means excessive attachment to something, so as to not let go of it. It doesn't mean that if someone wants one's bare necessities, it's moh. If one is hungry and wants to have lunch, would that be moh? According to this serial, it may well be. 😕

Valmiki never covered the topic of Lakshman & Urmila, so it's hard to say, but most accounts have it that Lakshman was not attached to Urmila at all, the way Rama was to Sita. Rama would have had to tell Lakshman to fall in love. And Lakshman feels smitten by Urmila b'cos she threatens him? 😆