Doesn't Priyanka Chopra know that only Muslims can be terrorists?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Sree

@Katyayani_devi

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#31

priyanka is so cool yo yo lol

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: NathuPyare
But I guess the makers of the show know this all too well 😆...another Muslim Terrorist, that too from Pakistan ??? ...a big YAWN 🥱 let's add some shock factor by showing a polar opposite scenario 😳

Exactly. Where is the shock factor in bold? It looks like news report, not fiction show. I think makers of the show had already shown a white terrorist, so they invented another new one. What is the big deal?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_
Not all violence is ideologically inspired, some guy going around just shooting random people for some political reason would be considered a terrorist, and there are white people who've been convicted of charges of terrorism, but if there is no reason behind it, then it wouldn't fall under the category of terrorism.

General public will not care, whether violence is ideologically inspired or not. One can do that on arm chair. On street, one does get influenced by colour. Can't help it. I don't exactly call it racist. (They are not thinking another race is inferior. It is just an involuntary act of self defence). Generalisation is bad. But human mind does it.

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: desiking3
Whataboutery" is the preferred mode of argument of the Hindu Right. According to this logic, cracking down on Hindu terrorists for lynching Muslims or murdering Dalits is hypocritical unless one also speaks out against atrocities being perpetrated against the Hindu minority in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and the displacement of Pandits from Kashmir.
The pea-brained foot soldiers of the saffron brigade are unaware or ignore the fact that all the "secular" journalists, and major news organisations, both Indian and international, have vehemently spoken out on those issues and continue to do so.

https://www.firstpost.com/politics/the-unimportance-of-being-a-bjp-dalit-worker-murder-of-a-boy-is-par-for-course-in-mamata-land-why-outrage-about-it-4490081.html

Police have not disclosed culprits identity yet. (Murdered boy's father had given them). I think, it is correct procedure (as nothing has been proven yet).

But if the boy had happened to be a Muslim, first thing that would have flashed on media is the religious identity of culprits and how India has gone intolerant.

Why hyppo got banned, when he never created as many igniting posts as the thread maker.

Quote

Flame.

@Flame.

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#35

Those randomly using words like 'Hindu terrorists' while describing certain instances of violence fail to understand the difference between terrorism and murder.

Terrorism is when a group or a person associated with a group with political/ideological motivations indulges in acts of violence. Those who carried out the attacks in Paris, Nice, London, etc were terrorists because they explicitly did it in the name of ISIS - a group that wishes to setup an Islamic Caliphate. Those who bombed the 1984 Kanishka flight were also terrorists belonging to the Khalistani movement - a movement aimed at carving out a separate state of Sikhs. Prabhakaran's LTTE also fell in the same category. Also, except communists we'd all agree even Naxalites/Maoists are terrorists.

Lone incidents of violence like the lynchings and killings are not acts of terrorism. They are gruesome murders. The man who sprayed bullets from a hotel window at those who were attending a concert in Las Vegas was not declared a terrorist not because he was a White male, or didn't belong to the Muslim community. It was because there wasn't any proof to link him to any political or ideological organisation or school of thought. Yes, his actions did 'terrorize' people, however, what he did was an act of mass murder.

Quote

Moderator

@Moderator

Global Moderator

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#36

The topic has been flagged for non-compliance with our Forum Rules / Code of Conduct and has been temporarily closed for further review.

For further concerns, please feel free to approach any member of the Development Team of this forum!

Regards,
I-F Development Team

Quote

1 2 3 4

Priyanka Chopra

Priyanka

Error

Doesn't Priyanka Chopra know that only Muslims can be terrorists? - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics